Around 
          the late 1950s, the Rio group carried out an en-masse critical review 
          of their previous position. They denounced the excessive dogmatism that 
          led to Concretism, the production of art according to formulas that 
          ended up submitting it to a system devoid of critical or artistic potential 
          instead of integrating art into life.
        
          As a result, the NeoConcretist Manifesto was published in the Sunday 
          Supplement of the Jornal do Brasil newspaper on March 23, 1959. The 
          First NeoConcrete Art Exhibition showed works by Lygia Clark, Lygia 
          Pape, Amílcar de Castro, Franz Weissmann, Reynaldo Jardim, Sergio 
          Camargo, Theon Spanudis and Ferreira Gullar. Other exhibitions followed, 
          in which other artists took part.
        "We 
          split from the concrete group from São Paulo because they wanted 
          to create a ten-year plan for future work. The Rio group thought this 
          was taking rationalism to the extreme. We wanted to work intuitively 
          but freely.
          We exchanged a great deal of information, but there was also a certain 
          impregnation, to the extent that one person conversed with another. 
          The NeoConcrete (movement) did not arise by chance, nor was it something 
          we developed and then started working on. We were led to it by our previous 
          experiments. Later, Gullar, who was a poet and copy-editor at Jornal 
          do Brasil, was a very good writer and had studied art theory, was charged 
          with writing a paper that covered everyone's work - a paper that succeeded 
          the work.
          There was total freedom. Nothing was dogmatic. Everyone was willing 
          to be creative. We didn't stick to conventional categories. In sculpture, 
          the idea was to destroy the base and create an object that could be 
          called a sculpture, but could be positioned in any way. Paintings would 
          no longer be surrounded by frames. They would move out in space. I invented 
          a book called the 'Book of Creation,' which recounts the creation of 
          the world without words. It is half plastic art, half poetry. This sense 
          of invention, of creation, was what truly characterized the movement. 
          In those days, people still believed that a painting had to be hung 
          on the wall for mere contemplation. There was no sense of participation, 
          of using different materials: so all of this led to a tremendous feeling 
          of freedom. It wasn't easy back then. The whole world was against us." 
          (Lygia Pape's deposition to Regina Célia Pinto)
        Mário 
          Pedrosa has observed with his habitual acuity that NeoConcrete art was 
          the "prehistory of Brazilian art." This definition, which 
          should not be taken literally, underscores the radical nature of the 
          NeoConcrete movement: it was prehistoric to the extent that it questioned 
          the essence of the existing artistic language and proposed a return 
          to the "beginnings" of art. 
          The NeoConcrete Manifesto, which is based on the philosophy of Merleau-Ponty, 
          retrieved humanity and rehabilitated the palpable, disqualified since 
          Plato, making it the basis of a real knowledge. The aim was to revitalize 
          the relationship between the individual and his or her work. 1
        ICONOGRAPHY
        7- 
          NeoConcrete Manifesto 
          Cf.: NeoConcretism Exhibition catalogue / 1959-1961, Banerj Art Gallery, 
          September 1984. 
          Note the modern layout of the Sunday Supplement of the Jornal do Brasil, 
          published on March 23, 1959.
        
          We do not conceive of a work of art as a "machine" or "object" 
          but as a "quasi-corpus"; that is, a being whose reality is 
          not exhausted by the external relationships of its elements; a being 
          that can be deconstructed into parts for analysis but can only be fully 
          understood through a direct, phenomenological approach. We believe that 
          a work of art surpasses the material mechanism on which it rests, but 
          not because it has an extraterrestrial quality: it surpasses it by transcending 
          such mechanical relationships (which is the aim of Gestalt) and create, 
          in and of itself, a tacit meaning (Merleau-Ponty) that emerges for the 
          first time.2
         
          
          A work of art was seen as being similar to a living organism. The absence 
          of a frame or support would bring it into real space - take art down 
          from its pedestal and include it in life - so people could become a 
          natural part of the artwork. By establishing relationships and carrying 
          out exchanges, the individual would continually create and recreate 
          the work. Thus, the support would cease to be the frame or pedestal 
          of a sculpture and become the body itself. This replacement of conventional 
          support with natural support indicates the radical nature of NeoConcrete 
          art. The aim was to be achieved somewhere between nature and culture, 
          almost anteceding culture as the original formulation of the real.3 
          
        
          From this standpoint, one can easily understand why Claude Lévi-Strauss 
          dedicated his book The Savage Mind to the philosopher Merleau-Ponty.4 
          In this book, we learn that there are two different modes of scientific 
          thought: one that is approximately adapted to the realm of perception 
          and the imagination, and another that is dislocated. It is as though 
          all necessary relationships, the subject of every science, Neolithic 
          or Modern, could be attained through two different paths - one that 
          is very close to sensitive intuition and the other more removed from 
          it.
        
          Ronaldo Brito 5 writes that NeoConcretism is centered 
          on the positivity of the constructive tradition - art as an instrument 
          for constructing society. If so, it would be contradictory, in view 
          of the fact that it would contradict its own postulates due to the artists' 
          practices, and work to partially break them. In the view of this critique, 
          the NeoConcrete was both the vertex of Brazilian constructive awareness 
          and the agent of its crisis.
          Lygia Pape disagrees with this view and writes that, for the NeoConcrete 
          movement, the idea of "inventing" new things would be a revolutionary 
          stance that did not involve politics or participation.
        
          Establishing a connection between these two opinions, we can conclude 
          that the NeoConcrete was seeking new paths. More palpable paths. The 
          manifesto postulated what had been learned through experience. Thus, 
          experience would be the act of doing merged with being - being that 
          could be constructed through the palpable. And such learning would involve 
          the entire body. It should be said that art could not be subjected merely 
          to the desire for certainty and accuracy; to extreme constructivist 
          rationalism. It is also subjected to the participation of viewers of 
          the work, making them take part in its explanation; awakening in them 
          the awareness their capacity for bringing about change.
        
          This transfer of artistic support to the body itself and the awareness 
          that we can become agents of change is said to have its remotest philosophical 
          origins in Nietzsche 6, who in the late nineteenth 
          century stated his opinion of despisers of the body, advising them to 
          "bid farewell to their own bodies, and thus be dumb": "Body 
          am I entirely, and nothing more; and soul is only the name of something 
          in the body."
        ICONOGRAPHY
        8- 
          A woodcut from the Tecelares series 
          Cf.: PAPE,Lygia et al., op. cit.,1983, p.8.
          Shown at the First NeoConcrete Exhibition, this woodcut represents research 
          done within a deliberately limited vocabulary to arrive at complex compositions 
          in which exactitude becomes tension and drama. It is a phase of large 
          black compound surfaces in which things cease to be what they are and 
          disclose their other self. The artist plays with space - what is the 
          figure, what is the ground? And what is the individual, what is society? 
          What is in and what is out? What is sensibility, and what is sense? 
          
          9- NeoConcrete Ballet.
          Cf.: Revista Galeria / 21, photo: Fernando Duarte
          The support for the art of "NeoConcrete Ballets" was the body 
          itself.
        "In 
          'Balé I,' there were four white cylinders and four orange-red 
          parallelograms; they were two meters high and set on small wheels. The 
          people hidden inside these shapes moved them around, using the human 
          body as an engine. The ballet was based on a poem by Reynaldo Jardim. 
          The choreography followed the poem, which consisted of two words, "alvo" 
          (target) and "olho" (eye), repeated by moving them on the 
          paper. Only the geometric shapes were visible on the stage. The sound, 
          produced by Reynaldo Jardim, consisted of two notes, using the piano 
          as a percussion instrument: pam, pam - pam/ pam - pam."
        ICONOGRAPHY:
        10- 
          Poem by Reynaldo Jardim
          Cf.: MAM documentation section.
        "As 
          for 'Balé II,' it consisted of nothing but two large 2 x 2-meter 
          squares - a pink one and another with a blue stripe along the top. These 
          shapes were also set on wheels, but they only moved at right angles. 
          The choreography was more rigid. The backdrop was also black, and there 
          was a very interesting moment when the pink square entered upstage and 
          was transformed into the ground, while the black one seemed to be the 
          figure. The inversion obtained was very beautiful." 
        According 
          to Arnheim 7, a concrete poem should be a concatenation 
          and not adopt the standards of logic, sparking a reaction in the reader's 
          mind by fusing all the elements into an organized whole. This is what 
          the ballets did. In fact, as the artist mentioned, the choreography 
          of "Balé I" was based on one such poem.
        
          NeoConcrete ballets could be called organic because they not only use 
          the human body to support art works but they point out the inconclusive 
          nature of reasoning. They express a multiplicity of relationships, ambiguities 
          and contradictions that lead spectators to complete the work, removing 
          them from their passive role.
        
          "NeoConcrete ballet hides the body to reveal it. There are no dancers, 
          only the dance." 8
          
        These 
          ballets only comprehend the parts when they form a whole. This whole 
          could be the dance or culture / society. Similarly, the individual is 
          only fully revealed in his or her cultural and social context. The ambiguity 
          found in these ballets links the spectators' attention to enable them 
          to perceive this absolute unity.
        
          ICONOGRAPHY
        11- 
          Lygia Pape shows her "Book of Creation" at the Second NeoConcrete 
          Art Exhibition
          Cf.: NeoConcretism Exhibition catalogue / 1959-1961, Banerj Art Gallery, 
          September 1984.
        Notes:
         1-GULLAR, 
          Ferreira, in MORAIS, Frederico. Neoconcretismo/1959-1961. Exhibition 
          Catalogue Banerj Gallery. Rio de Janeiro: n.p., 1984, n.pag.
          2-GULLAR, Ferreira et al. Manifesto Neoconcreto. Jornal do Brasil, 
          Suplemento Dominical . Rio de Janeiro: 1959, n.pag.
          3-GULLAR, Ferreira, op. cit, 1984, n.pag.
          4-LÉVI-STRAUSS,Claude, op. cit., 1989, p. 30.
          5-BRITO, Ronaldo. Neoconcretismo. Malasartes. Rio de Janeiro: (3): 9-13, 
          Apr./ Jun. 1976 , p. 9.
          6-NIETZSCHE, Friedrich Wilhelm. Assim falava Zaratustra.Tradução 
          de Eduardo Nunes Fonseca. São Paulo, Hemus Editora Limitada, 
          s/d.
          7-ARNHEIM, Rudolf. Arte & percepção visual. São 
          Paulo: Livraria Pioneira Editora, 1989, pp. 103, 104.
          8-DOCTORS, Marcio. Lygia Pape , a radicalidade do real. Galeria. São 
          Paulo, Área Editorial Ltda, 21: 68-75, 1990, p. 73.
        Essay 
          extracted from:
        PINTO, 
          Regina Célia. "Quatro olhares à procura de um leitor, 
          mulheres importantes, arte e identidade" ("Four Views in 
          Search of a Reader, Important Women, Art and Identity"). Rio 
          de Janeiro, 1994. 415p. Tese (Pós Graduação em 
          Artes visuais, Mestrado em História da Arte, área de Antropologia 
          da Arte ) - Escola de Belas Artes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.