Nature and the Web

What role should nature occupy on the web? (Christy1, 3/8/99 12:25:20 PM)

Canoeing the Juniper Run in the Ocala Forest, I was constantly aware of the presence of life and death. This has a balancing effect on me, checks the threat of arrogance. Working on the web can lead one to a heavy dependence on the intellect and technical prowess. How might the physicality and other characteristics of nature make their way onto the web? Or perhaps you think they shouldn't! Some argue that the new landscape is what appears on the screen. What are your opinions?


1 of 5
Jennifer Ley (jley, 3/10/99 12:26:09 AM)

My personal philosophy in this area is always to try to lend a 'hand made' aspect to many of my web presentations. I used to have long conversations with a web friend ... because I felt that so much that he did showed no 'hand print', and there's no reason why the web *can't* feel more touchable.

One art method I use is to draw first, then scan in my drawing and enhance it in Photoshop ... real pencil strokes maintain their integrity ...

The other is subject matter ... or the way one handles subject matter ... one thing that used to drive me nuts was the *webby hipness* of much html/hypertext work ... so much conceptualization in the verbiage ... the experience can easily become all head trip.

But, I think some people are aesthetically *wired* to enjoy work that's highly conceptual and wordy ... what I like isn't going to appeal to everyone ... in fact some people might find it old-fashioned ... but my newest hypertext piece (still in progress) at http://www.heelstone.com/Victorian/victorian.html ... flies in the face of technology ... and I love the way it looks.

2 of 5
Internet as Organism - this might be of interest (Sue Thomas, 3/10/99 3:13:30 AM)

The Internet as Model Organism - Meeting Brief on biological aspects of the net

Lois Wingerson (editor in chief, HMS Beagle)

[...] Fractals and their theoretical descendants have succeeded as models for the behavior of the Internet -- where the Poisson model failed -- because the telephone system is not a good analogy.

When you make a phone call, you occupy one dedicated line until you hang up; delivery is immediate and direct. The Internet acts more like a package delivery service. It picks up a very large number of packages and delivers them from "node" to "node" until they all reach their destinations. The packages can travel over any route, and can arrive out of order. Further, some go through one main post office, but others go through different routing centers.

Also like the postal service, the Internet slows down when demand gets heavy (think about Christmas). When demand gets too heavy, the Internet simply throws excess parcels away.

In 1993, a paper by the session's chairman, Walter Willinger of AT&T, proposed that one could describe this kind of traffic as a fractal. "This was a bombshell," [Vern] Paxson said. "It electrified the community." But it was clearly the right idea, he added. By now there is "very strong empirical evidence" that the behavior of human populations as they log on to and use the Web fits a fractal pattern.

Another speaker at the session presented such evidence. In Japan, Misako Takayasu of Keio University has found a way to measure the passage of Internet packets traveling to and from Tokyo.

Measuring from a packet's origin to the first node it passes, she said, its behavior is very "Poisson-like," but somewhere between the fourth and seventh junction it becomes ever more fractal-like.

Takayasu's team has been trying to understand what happens when the junctions are so jammed that the system begins to throw packets away. The analogy she chose for Internet traffic was infectious disease. Her slide showed a rank of schoolchildren sitting at desks.

If you ignore the immune system, she said, Internet traffic behaves very like an infectious disease viewed from the vantage point of the organism. Infection and recovery rates are dependent on interactions between neighbors and on the distance between them; so are the recovery rates of overcrowded Internet nodes (called routers). An infection can overburden and eradicate a host; on the other hand, a host can also recover. So can a router.

"This is one of the simplest trivial stochastic models," Takayasu said. "Many models having different evolution properties converge to the contact model." (In her abstract, she also used the term "evolve" to describe the future of the Internet.)

Going beyond modeling, Takayasu's team used the Internet as an experimental organism, sending packets to and from the most congested points, predicting what would happen at times of high congestion and measuring the actual behavior of the packets.

Curiously, like the overworked executive who functions best under pressure, "the network can transport packets most efficiently at the critical point between congestion and the non-congestion phase," she said (making yet another analogy, to phase transition in physical chemistry.) "If we can control to the critical point," she predicted, "we can make it an efficient system."

Will the Internet get so crowded it eventually breaks down? someone asked Paxson during the discussion. Everyone's crystal ball fails about two years out, he responded, but he went on: "The network has basic mechanisms within itself to avert a collapse. . . . The system is very elastic."

The Internet might never have survived at all, added the final speaker, Deborah Estrin of the University of Southern California, if it had been built as a rigid and stable steady-state entity. "Robustness," she concluded, "is the ability to continue to operate in the existence of continual component change."

Sound familiar? Mathematicians may not yet understand the Internet's behavior, but biologists can certainly recognize some of its qualities. ---------------

3 of 5
Margaret Penfold (Saada, 3/22/99 5:32:10 PM)

I have on several occasions had recourse to the net to answer such questions as "What is the incubation periods for fox-cubs" What are the migratory patterns for thrushes. The net is a good place for keeping those photographs of nature and other things within one's own back yard. A digital camera is quite useful for recording primroses, snails and frogs. Not so good for things that move out of close focus. Then it is loading the good camera and frequent trips to the chemist, unfortunately beyond both my memory and my pocket.

4 of 5
Christy Sheffield Sanford (Christy1, 3/22/99 9:19:14 PM)

Thanks, Saada, what kind of digital camera do you have? I have been looking but haven't made up my mind yet. Beautiful line, by the way, the one with primroses, snails and frogs. And have you put any of your nature images up on the web? I would like to see them. Have you considered adding them to your journal?

5 of 5
Christy Sheffield Sanford (Christy1, 3/27/99 9:43:28 PM)

I would like to create the effect on the web of writing on water. If anyone has an idea of how this could be done, let me know. Also, is it possible to have wide angle cam shots, panormanic format? Say 10 in. long by 3 in. wide; this would be a landscape-like format?