|
|
THE CITRUS AFFAIR DEBATE trAce was recently invited to host an Online Writing Competition with a difference - it is open to disabled people only. Our immediate response was to ask, "But how do we know the entrants are bona fide disabled, and what does ‘disabled’ mean anyway?" After all, one of the reasons many of us enjoy working in cyberspace is because we believe it goes some way towards transcending the kind of definition which is driven by our physical existence. We feel it gives us a chance to meet others on our own terms and without attracting prejudice or discrimination. We thought about the project long and hard, and in the end we decided to host it. But we’d like to hear your views. Check out The Citrus Affair and let us know what you think. Silvie at NDAF replied: There have been complaints about this restriction. May we ask these
people: would you also raise your voices in anger if this was a
competition for "women only", for "children only" or for "black
people only"?" Let's have a look at the background: Read: "Disability Arts". Disabled people themselves have coined this term to identify the arts produced by disabled people that fill a yawning void - the arts that are informed by the experience of disability and which validate this experience. Disability Arts is inextricably linked with the wider political and
social movement of disabled people and as such can be broadly
identified as art that is ultimately for change - change in the
untenable way disabled people are treated by society. The first sentence of NDAF's mission statement says that it is our
objective "to create equality of opportunity for disabled people in
all aspects of the arts". We are trying to create opportunities within all sectors of the arts world for disabled artists whose prime concern is not a longing for assimilation into mainstream arts, but who want to explore their own experience and find an audience that is receptive and able to appreciate what they are doing. Luckily enough there are now mainstream arts organisations like trAce who have, not just on paper, real respect for cultural diversity and don't try to squeeze minorities into places they think would be right for them. There are plenty of other arts (and disability) organisations that
disabled and nondisabled people can join if they feel disability arts
is not for them. The same applies to competitions they can take part
in. Email trace@ntu.ac.uk with your comments. We'll put them online - so you can take this chance to air your views. 13 October 1999 15 October 1999 16 October 1999 23 October 1999 28 October 1999 Anything that disabled people/mentally ill, have the opportunity to,
such as a internet writing competition or any thing else that is
restricted solely to them is a great thing. It makes a change from all
the myriad of problems and restrictions that disabled people have in
there lifes. Therapeuticly, creative writing is a great thing for mentally ill
people. Personally I feel the Internet is a great place for mentally ill people also. Schizophrenics, Manic Depressives, etc are usually intelligent, interesting, articulate people. But because of their bouts of illness, periods in hospital, being sectioned, answering back at voices, breakdowns, etc, many have little or no friends, no job, are isolated and frequently attempt and succeed in comitting suicide.
On the Internet mentally ill people and people with physical disabilities are on a even playing field. Mentally ill people can talk
to people on the other side of the world, who have no predudice,
missconceptions or fear them, unlike the people in the home town of the
mentally ill person. Not everyone is predudiced against mentally ill people. But in my
opinion and experience, the majority of people in the UK are , and that
needs to change. I could probably go on for days about the inequalities and societal
problems and missconceptions surrounding mental illness, but I won't.
Keep up the good work trAce. In The Lexikon Newsletter, Issue 28 Early this year, Trace Online Writing Community were asked by the
National Disability Arts Forum, (NDAF) to host an online writing
competition. Nothing could be wrong with that, surely. Then came
the bombshell, it is only open to disabled writers. As a disabled
person myself, (well, blind actually), I find this utterly
distasteful. We want to move forward for God sake, not backwards!
'Integrate, integrate,' seems to be the way of the future, but
here's a competition which discourages such a move. Disabled, (whatever that means) people want equal rights like
everyone else and have full and equal access to all aspects of
culture and media. Trace said: "One of the reasons many of us enjoy working in
cyberspace is because we believe it goes some way towards
transcending the kind of definition which is driven by our
physical existence. We feel it gives us a chance to meet others
on our own terms and without attracting prejudice or
discrimination. We thought about the project long and hard, and
in the end we decided to host it. But we'd like to hear your
views." While I respect the work of NDAf, I believe they should have
given more thought to the competition and left it open to all.
Besides, how do we know the entrants are disabled? 1 November 1999 There is a plethora (yes, I do know what it means!) of writing competitions and opportunities out there - so I am bemused, not to say amused, by the kerfuffle over the Citrus Affair being for Disabled writers only. Could it be that the prospect of getting is print is the only reason such criticism has reared it's green-eyed head? To be published:the Holy Grail of all writers. Do some writers see this as an outlet for their, as yet, unrecognised talent? And if so, why haven't they been recognised YET? Talent will out. It's just a pity that, under the banner of integration, certain scribes seek to undermine a project that (in my eyes) seeks to bring Disabled artists in from the cold. Sad, eh? DANNY START |