My grandmother,
who was born in 1896, told me:
"I
like romances, I like stories. Yes, I like. Now I do not know, the time
went by...
When I was young the women were different. We could not do things, stories...
only sometimes. I had wish but I did not have perhaps competence to
write a story. Neither I had the facilities of today. I belong to 96,
I do not belong to 900. When I was born women did not study. Who am
I? I went to school because my mother was a little bit more advanced.
She was one of
the few advanced people..."
My
grandmother Sylvia , 94 years old/ 1990
My grandmother
studies were only the elementary school's studies, however she read
one book a week during great part of her life.
It is interesting
to compare the text of my grandmother and Saij's bio, who was born 58
years after 1896.
Isabel
Saij
born 1954
french
lives and works in Mervent (France) and Vienna (Austria)
1984 : dissertation in "visual art and science of art" La
Sorbonne Paris 1
subject : "Egon Schiele 1890/1918"
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
The first
movements toward universal suffrage (or manhood suffrage) occurred in
the early 19th century, and focused on removing property requirements
for voting. Only in the late 19th and early 20th century, the focus
of universal suffrage became the removal of restrictions against women
having the right
to vote.
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
These
few paragraphs above which I chose to start my comments on Isabel Saij's
work evidence the XX century importance for the feminine gender.
"Political
Transparency", Isabel Saij's work which we are analyzing, demonstrates
political understanding and reveals that using Art and Technology, without
any doubt, it is a consequence of the feminine gender's conquests of
the XX century.
"Political
Transparency" and the Author's text on the work ("A black
and white, a black or white system or wise of thinking, a binar one,
a manicheanone, in a grey zone with barred windows.") remind me
"Mille Plateaux" by Deleuze and Guattari, where they affirm
that the face is a white wall with a black hole and also they indicate
the relationship between body and power. It is the despotic and authoritarian
power's concrete arrangement which unchains the abstract machine of
"visageité", which operates a "visagéification"
of the whole body, of their surroundings and of their objects, turning
into landscape all the worlds and ambients. The face is political. We
are what the power wants!
"Political
Transparency" or "Abstract Machine of 'Visageité'"
Saij stated:
"We're
the sheep, whether we like it or not. The broadcast is perpetually lying,
the press lies, manipulating and manipulated, and the politicians seem
to orchestrate the whole, entirely bound, as we are. What could they
do, apart from making a marvellous shining show... We're the sheep and
the puppets. They are too.."
The
face as Landscape - Salvador Dali , El Gran Paranoico, 1936
Undo the
face is not a small work. If the face is political, undo it also is
a politics. We can not fight against the face and against the abstract
machine of "visageité", It is necessary to fight with
these elements and to invent a new use for them.
It is only
in the conscience and in the subjective passion's black hole, where
each one connects to the unknown spaces of the other, that we can dismount
that system... We have need of thinking head's intellectual availability
(like the Isabel Saij's thinking head) which enable the abstract machine
of "visageité" for a different operation, then a year
zero will start, but for that it is necessary to break the previous
codes.
"Have
a good time, relax, every thing's fine. We can trust them, they do their
job for our own good...they protect us...sure... Wolfowitz became administrator
of the world bank." (Isabel Saij)
Will we
be really in a labyrinth without exit * or does it remain some hope?
Another
French Author, Jean Duvignaud, stated:
"Artistic
creation is a bet on the human species capacity to invent new kinds
of relations and to live still unknown emotions."
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
*...labyrinths.,
dear Isabel, could you tell us anything on "e-motions". your
surprising series of sheep? https://archive.the-next.eliterature.org/museum-of-the-essential/sheep
(Isabel Saij [III])
Bibliography:
DELEUZE,
Gilles et Guattari, Félix. Mille plateaux. Paris: Les
Éditions Minuit, 1980.
DUVIGNAUD,
Jean. Sociologia da Arte. Rio de Janeiro, Editora Forense, 1970.
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
And
you, what do you THINK?
1-
Do you also believe in the human species' CREATION POWER to change our
"political landscape"?
2-
Do you believe in UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE to change the world?
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Isabel
Saij answers:
Dear
Regina, dear all,
First
of all, thank you, Regina, for your invitation.
It’s a real pleasure to take part in the "collaborative review“.
Do you know that Brazil is celebrated in France this year?
Many (official) cultural exchanges! The "collaborative review"
is surely one of the most original, exclusive and unofficial project.
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Question
!:
"Do
you also believe in the human species CREATION POWER to change our "political
landscape"? "
It
would be foolish to think that an artistic creation could change the
world. Nevertheless I think it is necessary to be active in order to
criticize. As an artist -as a "free" sheep?- I've the impression
that some works provokereactions from the political/economical/financial
side. For instance: the case Steve Kurtz in the USA.
And
now the answer of Bill Gates to the question:
"What's
driving this, and do you think intellectual-property laws need to be
reformed?"
No,
I'd say that of the world's economies, there's more that believe in
intellectual property today than ever. There are fewer communists in
the world today than there were. There are some new modern-day sort
of communists who want to get rid of the incentive for musicians and
moviemakers and software makers under various guises.
Bill
Gates is clearly against people, artists putting works under a copyleft
or a creaqtive commons license. The two instances show a fear. A trial
against an artist, a sever accusation against people, artists who want
to share and spread culture and knowledge. Well, artists with little
power lead to strong reactions from the US-administration and from the
richest man of the world. A change of the "political landscape",
of course no, but the signification of the reaction should not be underestimated.
Question
2:
"Do
you believe in UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE to change the world?"
If I was living in one of the numerous dictatorial country of this world
I would be very happy of course to get the possibility to vote. A vote
= a signal of my own existence. Now what is the situation in some "old"
democracy? Here in Europe (where I live and where I've some idea about
the situation) we have a social-democrat administration in Germany and
a liberal administration in France. About 10 years ago it was exactly
the contrary. Currently in the 2 countries the unemployment is very
high (roughly 10%) and the number of poor people is steadily increasing
(as well as the fortune of the richest).
Conclusion: whatever your vote is and the changes of administration
it brings the result is the same: no improvement for those who desesperatly
want and expect it! I would like to get some opinions from other continents
or countries.
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Newsletter's
Members answers:
(The answers
are placed by order of arrival)
I)- Isabel
Aranda Yto (Chile)
1- The
political landscape has had the creative power's participation since
it has existed, for good things or bad things... If the human being
becomes aware that he can and that he must change the political landscape,
the creative power will be a great tool. These two elements have to
go united, the conscience and the creativity. It is difficult to change
the political landscape because the majority of people is directioned
from above, their natural instinct is manipulated in favor of the classes
leaders' benefit. I believe that in modern times the creative power
of some well-meaning people is not enough.
2- If the
votings are manipulated, if people has no conscience, for what the suffrage
servers? I believe that the Universal Suffrage changes the world permanently,
but not always for the better. It is an indispensable tool, but it is
not in itself our societies' salvation.
Isabel
Aranda YTO
http://www.yto.cl
II- Brad
Brace: (Canadá / USA)
1 e 2-
Hi Regina -- I think there's a universal revolution brewing...
III- David
Daniels: (USA)
1. YES! I believe in the human species creation power to change our
"political landscape".
2. No.
I don't believe universal suffrage can change the world. I believe that
the only thing that can change the world in a good way is Universal
Self Knowledge. Everything is taught in schools except our own Self.
People know so little about their own Self and its needs that they are
easily tricked.
* Below
a small portion of
Daniel's interview, in which he explains poetically his thought.
"And
if you want to see The Truth look in the face of a smiling child. Laughter
is the truth flying up from the depths of the human being. Happiness
is a buried treasure. If you realized there was a treasure buried inside
you, would you dig inside you until you found it? Would you say 'Open
Sesame' to a rock wall inside you and see it open to a cave full of
magnificent treasure? To a tiny invisible engine surrounded by light
messengers spinning a gigantic gold and ruby and pearl and blood cocoon
around its Self?
When children
are born they are a fine invisible engine as soft as the mirror on a
pool of silk water inside a clumsy automobile. As they grow they crash
in accidents and get dents and scrapes and road dirt all over their
automobile. They are trained to forget they are an invisible engine
inside. They are forced into believing the totality of their being is
fender and bumper dents and scrapes and road dirt. They are taught by
their owners to devote their life to speeding and crashing and hauling
and listening to a loud ridiculous radio and repairing and painting
their fender and bumper dents and scrapes. Whenever they say - "I
have an invisible engine." (Which is as close as they are able
to come to "I am an invisible engine.") or "I can hear
the tune of my invisible engine."- They are told that they are
crazy, or to go on a boring drive they hate, or it is God, or you must
become as solid as a rock wall. Early in their young shining fluttering
life most humans have totally forgotten they are an invisible engine."
IV- Joesér
Alvarez: (Brazil)
1- The
political landscape is a picture of doubtful taste that restoration
and painter can not change, only a very powerful creativity for change
that picture.
2- If Universal
Suffrage's capacity was just like the meteor that fell into Mexico's
Golf, I would tell that yes ...
V- Paulo
Silveira: (Brazil)
1 e 2 -
The answers are YES and YES, and I have satisfaction in answering that,
even though the changes can be more discreet than we would like. I trust
in this. And that is my seem, not only a hope.
VI- Jim
Andrews: (Canada)
Yes, I
believe 1 and 2 :)
VII- Paulo
Villela: (Brazil)
1- Yes.
But the almost impassable difficulty will be to thrill the human mass
for make the transformation happens. A political work on a creative
product.
2- I imagine
an universal assembly to solve the subject. I really think that with
the step by step smaller world we have nowadays, it finishes happening.
And the result of this ?
A more powerful block squashing the rest...
VIII- Muriel
Frega: (Argentina)
1- This
is one of the themes in which I do not believe. Politics is something
that basically bores me, because it gathers the characteristics that
most displease me: lies, hidden things, conveniences, corruption.
2- mhmhmhm,
I do not believe. I would be enchanted in believe that it is possible...
but the reality in small scale shows me just the opposite.
IX- Ricardo
Báez Duarte: (Venezuela)
1- Frankly
( and regretfully) I do not. History teaches that this is almost impossible.
I believe in the forces of History " a la Spengler".
2- No,
I do not. Suffrage is based in theory on the intelligence of the People,
but as reality shows the People always lacks intelligence and is only
moved irrationally and emotionally.
X- Marcelo
Frazão: (Brazil)
1- Unfortunatelly
not. Change is possible only through more objective information (at
least in Brazilian reality).
2- No.
Only the human being can change the world.
XI - Edward
Picot (UK)
1- If you
mean can we change the political landscape through the power of creativity,
I think the answer is both yes and no. I don't think an artwork can
change the political landscape, or at least it's very rare for such
a thing to happen. However, I think digital technology, particularly
the Web, is changing the whole shape of society, and creativity is a
part of this.
2- If you
mean should everybody have the vote, then of course. Or should everybody's
voice be heard - of course again.
XII - Nilda
Saldamando (Chile)
1- Yes
it is possible. And it is in evidence in multiple occasions ...... because
the creation power is the capacity of creating other realities that
modify unavoidably the "political landscape" of immobile appearance
under the powers that intend a permanent control .... and happens that
suddenly human beings (men and women) create the unexpected marking
one before and one after ... constituted today as historical landmarks
of the human process ....
2- Which
world ?? the one of each one of us .... the one of a group .... the
one of a city ....the one of a country .... and sometimes yes ... understanding
that there are not the absolute changes yet ..... the suffrage manifests
an option to consider which does not allow doubts .... Like the NO to
the dictatorship ... this No, yes, it changed our world ....
XIII- Aliette
Guibert - France
1- Yes
and not. No in establishing or constituting power (the same step to
come); the only matter which reproduces best itself since a millennium
they are the forms of the power of the men on the other men. Yes in
social subject, in the field of the individual or collective autonomy
(a landscape allowing a novative real time -no utopia).
2- Yes but the real one which books the useless or white votes as valid
votes. Otherwise the universal suffrage navigates towards the abstention.
For another hand nobody canoverestimate the change, it is according
to the vote (good or bad:). I am for the universal suffrage in any thing
and most frequently, as far as it is not manipulated by a proportional
system. The universal suffrage to elect symbolically appreciative people
in charge in front of the community. The Labor or creative councils
as a cooperative basis for villages. At this point, the cognitive leader
up to the end of theproject being the author of its concept but changing
at the time of the next.
XIV- Elizabeth
Curtis (UK)
1- Yes,
I think that Art can change the "political landscape". There
are many artists who have a new set of values: acknowledgment of our
lives in an interconnected universe combined with achieving success
in the world. Creative work in service to the whole encompasses this
vision and makes it plausible. We could all be artists of social change.
2- Yes.
I believe that Universal Suffrage can change the world. It has to be
the right of everyone to vote.
XV- Clemente
Padín
1-
It depends on the historical circumstances. In general art is innocuous
in relation to social changes and revolutions. Nevertheless, when the
democratic communication channels are obstructed (as in the dictatorships
or under a State terrorism) Art can replace that deficiency. Art necessarily
expresses the social conflict (it cannot be avoid, it is impossible...
) and only can change the society if it gets to transmit the necessity
of changes. That is to say, it is not Art that changes Society but people,
people that assume the conscience of necessity of changes.
2-
Under the capitalist democratic regime, as we know it, it is evident
that Universal suffrage can not change anything. It only offers the
illusion that history is in our hands. It does not matter if we are
under a progressive government or a left governement it is obvious that
it has not been possible to advance an apex forward of society great
structural changes . On the other hand, as the votings are planned (by
lists, regions or by social nuclei) it is impossible to obtain their
legitimización, not even logical. Nevertheless, it is preferable
to vote than to suffer under a dictatorship.